RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-03721
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His Fitness Assessments (FA) dated 7 May 12 and 8 Aug 12 be
removed from his records.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
His medical condition unfairly precluded him from attaining a
passing score on the contested FAs. After being on a profile
that precluded him from running, push-ups, and sit-ups for 390
days, he was required to take the contested FA within 60 days of
the profile expiration. He sustained a left elbow injury in
February of 2011 and, as result, required two surgeries. He
developed significant heterotopic ossification and had
additional surgery with radiation in September of 2011. He was
advised by his orthopedic surgeon not run due to jarring motions
that could result in additional additional surgery and loss of
movement in his left arm. From 11 Feb 11 to 9 Mar 12, he was on
profile that included no running, push-ups, and sit-ups. Prior
to the contested FA failures, the applicant had no history of FA
failures.
________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant served in the Regular Air Force during the matter
under review.
On 11 Feb 11, an AF Form 422, Notification of Air Force Members
Qualification Status, was issued to the applicant, which
resulted in him being exempt from running, walking, sit-ups, and
push-ups. This AF Form 422 continued to be extended with
exercises noted that the applicant could and could not perform.
On 7 May 12, the applicant participated in the contested FA and
failed to attain the minimum score in the cardio component. As
a result, he was credited with 9.40 points for the cardio
component and attained an overall composite score of 41.33,
resulting in an unsatisfactory rating.
On 8 Aug 12, the applicant participated in the contested FA and
failed to attain the minimum score in the cardio component. As
a result, he was credited with 29.90 points for the cardio
component and attained an overall composite score of 67.40,
resulting in an unsatisfactory rating.
On 14 Feb 14, the Fitness Assessment Appeals Board (FAAB)
disapproved the applicants request for relief on the basis that
the applicant was medically cleared after elbow surgeries to
perform all components of the FA. The applicant had 60 days to
prepare and recondition for the FA.
In accordance with AFI 36-2905, Fitness, paragraph 5.2.2.3, the
expiration date represents the date the member is medically
cleared to resume activities previously restricted. Members
with Duty Limiting Conditions (DLCs) of 30 days or less are
eligible to complete an FA when their restrictions expire, and
will test within 30 days if due or overdue. For DLCs lasting
greater than 31 days, members are eligible to complete the full
four component FA 42 days after the expiration date of the
physical limitations.
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are
described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of
primary responsibility, which is attached at Exhibit C.
________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of
an error or an injustice. While the applicant contends that a
medical condition, coupled with the lack of time to prepare for
the contested FAs, precluded successful completion, there is
insufficient evidence to support the applicants claim. It is
noted that the applicant submitted medical records detailing his
injuries, profile limitations, and letter, dated 24 Jul 13, from
his provider stating the applicant was on profile for 390 days,
and should be able to retest now that he has a sufficient amount
of time to prepare for the FA. As per the medical records
provided, the applicant had the last follow up on 19 Dec 11 and
was released without limitations. In accordance with AFI 36-
2905, Fitness Program, AFGM 2.1 (dated 26 Jun 12), paragraph 10a
- b: If an applicant is injured or ill and is unable to
complete all required components, they have the option of being
evaluated at the Medical Treatment Facility (MTF) but his/her
test will still count unless rendered invalid by the unit
commander. The applicant did not provide an invalidation
memorandum to remove the contested FAs. If the medical
evaluation validates the illness/injury, the unit commander may
invalidate the test results. Airmen will be required to retest
within five duty days or when capable based on the
recommendations of the medical provider/Medical Liaison Officer,
and exercise physiologist. Therefore, the Board should deny the
relief requested by applicant due to lack of supporting
documentation.
A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIM evaluation is at Exhibit B.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the
applicant on 28 Feb 14 for review and comment within 30 days.
As of this date, no response has been received by this office
(Exhibit C).
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by
existing law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. We took
notice of the applicants complete submission, including medical
and other documentation pertaining to his physical limitations,
in judging the merits of the case. However, we do not find the
documentation submitted by the applicant sufficient to conclude
that corrective action is warranted. While the applicant may
believe the 60-day period he was provided for re-conditioning
was insufficient given that he was on a profile for 390 days, he
has provided no evidence that he has been treated differently
than others similarly situated. In this respect, we note that
the governing instruction provides a 42-day reconditioning
period upon the expiration of a profile. Therefore, in the
absence of evidence that there was some error by the medical
community in determining when his limitations should have
expired, we find no basis to recommend granting the relief
sought in this application.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this
application.
________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket
Number 2013-03721 in Executive Session on 21 May 14, under the
provisions of AFI 36-2603:
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, 23 Jul 13, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicants Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSID, dated 3 Jan 14.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 28 Feb 14.
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
WASHINGTON DC
Office of the Assistant Secretary
After careful consideration of your application for correction of military records,
AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2013-03721, the Board determined there was insufficient
evidence of an error or injustice to warrant corrective action. Accordingly, your application is
denied.
You have the right to submit a request for reconsideration by the Board. However, such a
request must be accompanied by newly discovered relevant evidence that was not available at the
time of your original application. Absent such additional evidence, further consideration of your
application is not possible. Additionally, the reiteration of facts previously addressed by the
Board, uncorroborated personal observations, or additional arguments on the evidence of record
is also not grounds for reopening a case.
Should you decide to submit a request for reconsideration of your case, please forward
your request and any supporting evidence to the address below where it will be reviewed to
determine if it meets the criteria for reconsideration by the Board:
SAF/MRBR
550 C Street West Suite 40
Randolph AFB TX 78150-4742
THIS ACTION IS TAKEN UNDER THE AUTHORITY DELEGATED BY THE
SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE.
Executive Director
Air Force Board for Correction
of Military Records
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03721
After being on a profile that precluded him from running, push-ups, and sit-ups for 390 days, he was required to take the contested FA within 60 days of the profile expiration. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility, which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial indicating there is no...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05833
After the FA the applicant visited his medical provider and was given a corrected profile. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial of the applicants request to void/remove the FA dated 25 Jan 13. While the AFI does state that a member who is using albuterol medication should be exempt on the walk component, the applicant did not provide justification that would prove he was taking the medication at the time of his...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01688
The applicants last six FA results are as follows: Date Composite Score Rating 3 Mar 14 85.00 Satisfactory (Exempt from Cardio/PU/SU) 9 Sep 13 96.38 Excellent (Exempt from PU/SU) 7 Mar 13 87.63 Satisfactory (Exempt from PU/SU) 11 Sep 12 82.00 Satisfactory (Exempt from PU/SU) 30 Apr 12 82.00 Satisfactory (Exempt from Cardio/PU/SU) *31 Jan 12 72.63 Unsatisfactory (Exempt from PU/SU) * Contested FA In accordance with guidance at the time of contested FA, AFI 36-2905_AFGM3 (3 Jan 12),...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01802
The applicants last eight FA results are as follows: Date Composite Score Rating 13 Nov 13 100 Excellent (Exempt from Cardio/PU) 9 May 13 100 Excellent (Exempt from Cardio/PU) *25 Mar 13 33.33 Unsatisfactory (Exempt from PU) *12 Dec 12 - Removed by FAAB 22 Jan 14 28 Jun 12 100 Excellent (Exempt from Cardio/PU/SU) *19 Mar 12 - Removed by FAAB 22 Jan 14 2 Aug 11 84.70 Satisfactory 28 Apr 11 77.90 Unsatisfactory (minimum SU) * Contested FA In accordance with guidance at the time of contested...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01643
IAW AFI 36-2905, Para 2.10.4 Members with a duty limiting condition (DLC) prohibiting them from performing one or more components of the FA will have a composite score calculated on the assessed components. On 14 Aug 12, the applicant participated in the contested FA and was tested on the sit-up, push-up and AC components of the test. IAW AFI 36-2905; Attach 1, para 10, If the medical evaluation validates the illness/injury, the Unit Commander may invalidate the test results; and para...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03162
The applicants last five FA results are as follows: Date Composite Score AC Component Rating 11 Jun 13 Exempt Exempt Exempt all four categories *29 May 13 0.0 36.00/0.00 Unsatisfactory (Exempt from Cardio/PU/SU) 29 Oct 12 85.50 32.50/17.10 Satisfactory (Exempt from Cardio/PU/SU) 23 Apr 12 100.00 31.00/20.00 Excellent (Exempt from Cardio/PU/SU) 31 Oct 11 79.50 33.50/15.90 Satisfactory (Exempt from Cardio/PU/SU) * Contested FA In accordance with guidance at the time of contested FA, AFI...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01097
Members will be eligible for FA 42 days after the expiration date of physical limitations, as annotated on Air Force (AF) Form 469. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends the cardio component of the applicant’s FA, dated 29 November 2011, be updated to reflect “exempt” in AFFMS. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: In accordance with AFI 36-2603,...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05279
On 25 Oct 13 she received an updated AF Form 469, stating that she was exempt from the cardio component of the FA. The applicant's AF Form 469 shows the cardio limitations expired on 23 Sep 13, which would have allowed the applicant to complete the cardio component of the FA. The applicant did not provide an updated AF Form 469 to show the exemption expired on a later date.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01465
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-01465 XXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Fitness Assessment (FA), dated 27 Sep 12 be declared void and removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). On 22 Jan 14 a similar request was considered and denied by the Fitness Assessments Appeals Board (FAAB) due to...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01179
As of this date, no response has been received by this office. ________________________________________________________________ 2 THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to the APPLICANT, be corrected to show that the cardio component of his Fitness Assessment score dated 1 February 2012, be updated to reflect “exempt” in the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). ...